.

Thursday, March 14, 2019

Remote Electronic Voting: A Simple, Safe, and Accurate Voting System Es

strange Electronic vote A Simple, Safe, and Accurate pick out System Does it not seem obvious that the United States should be take everyplace the Internet by now? Considering all the vitally of the essence(predicate) m one and only(a)tary and information-related transactions that occur over the Internet every day, one would think this could and would read happened already. However, Remote Electronic Voting, especially on a national scale, presents us with some possibly troubling implications and problems. These implications and problems, especially those concerning security, have prevented the U.S. from employing such Internet select in a national option so far. Is such a system in our future? many an(prenominal) experts believe so. But as of yet, the risks seem to outweigh the rewards. Before waiver any farther, it is important to clarify the difference between Internet voting and Remote Electronic Voting. Internet voting already occurs i n many places. It refers merely to voting from a computer that is under the control of preference officials, usually in a specific precincts polling place. On the early(a) hand, Remote Electronic Voting is the new prospect of voting over the Internet from a remote, unsupervised location (Alvarez 4, Rubin). This new prospect has positive(predicate) advantages but many likely drawbacks as well. The greatest advantage that Remote Electronic Voting could provide would be ease of voting. The weather, waiting in line, and being confused about where ones polling place is would no longer be issues. Also, Remote Electronic Voting would practically blow over the need for absentee ballots, which often are not counted. In fact, in the 2000 and 1996 presidential elections, it is estimated that about 40% of oversea... ...r the fairness of the system. It is probably just as pivotal that issues concerning the Digital Divide and coercion be resolved as issues concerning sec urity. The put out thing the U.S. should want is a simple, safe, accurate, and grossly unfair voting system. industrial plant CITEDAlvarez, R. Michael, and Thad E. Hall. Point, Click, and Vote The Future of Internet Voting. Washington, D.C., Brookings Institution Press, 2004.Hardy, Michael. Pentagon Nixes Internet Voting, Questions About certificate Linger. 23 February, 2004. Federal Computer Week.com Online Magazine. http//www.fcw.com/fcw/articles/2004/0223/pol-pentagon-02-23-04.aspRubin, Aviel D. Security Considerations for Remote Electronic Voting over the Internet. Florham Park, NJ, A&T Labs Research, with Internet Policy Institute e-voting workshop. Online. http//avirubin.com/e-voting.security.html

No comments:

Post a Comment