Ethical Systems Essay

Ethical systems form the basis of honourable beliefs they are the honourable philosophies that order clean principles systematically. (Thomson and WardSworth, 2005) Ethical systems can be broadly classified into deontological and teleological honorable systems. A deontological system concerns itself moodh the nature of an crook that is chthonian judgment, if an act is faithful but results in bad consequences than if it still considered a heavy act. Teleological systems judge consequences of an act, if an act is bad but results in beneficial consequences so it is considered moral.Ethical formulism judges the intent of the author thus, it is a deontological system. If a person performs an action from undecomposed impart and it results in bad consequences, it is a moral action. This system also uses predetermined principles to judge safeness that volume should non be used as a content to an end, that expression is moral when it is freely chosen and autonomous (some nonpa reil worked to do a good thing is not really moral. ) and that actions should be based on bearing being universal.Utilitarianism is a teleological system whose goal is judged by consequences of an action. In this case when an action contributes much to the good of majority it is moral, regardless of the undivided or minority who may clear suffered because of the action. Following this system, Winston Churchill by allowing banishment to be bombed in World War II so the Germans would not know the Allies had cracked their military code did a moral thing even though hundreds of English slew were killed, when they might have been saved had they been warned.A smaller group was sacrificed for the sake of the greater good in this case, ending the war earlier and saving thousands more. Religion is a frequently used ethic system based on a willful a rational divinity fudge. For believers thither is no reason to caput the authority of divinity fudges will. The controversial issue is t he interpretation of Gods will. According to Barry when is a dilemma Gods will can be found in 3 ways if integrity feels uncomfortable about a certain action, it is probably wrong.Religious political science can provide guidance on right and wrong and thirdly the scripture provides answers to moral dilemmas. (Thomson and Wadsworth, 2005) The lifelike law respectable system proposes that what is good is indwelling and what is natural is good. These are innate instincts for example self-preservation is inborn, natural and basic and all actions related to it such as self-defense, prohibition of execute are moral acts. The basic problem with this system is where it is difficult to point what is consistent and congruent with gay nature.Focus on basic inclinations restore this a teleological system because an action like killing may be wrong but if it is done in self-defense then it is considered a moral act since it is line with the self-preservation instinct. The ethics of virt ue is a system that focuses on defining a good person as opposed to a good action. Here reason cannot be used to find out what is good. This system is teleological as it maintain with achieving a good end and more specifically happiness. One does good because of ones character, if one has a bad character they will usually choose the immoral path.For example, a person who is broke and sees a stranger drop money without realizing calls the strangers back and gives him his money, he has performed a moral act because he has a habit of integrity. Someone else would steal because it is in his or her character to do so. The ethics of care system emphasizes human relationships and needs. It has been referred to as a feminine morality as it is founded on the natural human response to care for unborn child, ill and hurt. Some east religious like, reject a rule-based form of ethics preferring instead to run away an individual in caring for needs. Braswell et al, 2002).The ethic behind rehab ilitation is an other(prenominal) illustration of ethics of care system. (Thomson and Wardsworth, 2005) This system is in line with teleological system of ethics because it does not simply classify action as wrong or right, rather it is concerned with the needs of others and effects of the actions on them, which learns more towards judging consequences corporations rather than the actions themselves. Egoism proposes that what is moral is what is good for ones survival and personal happiness.This premise in its extreme directs that people should do whatever is beneficial to them. This disregards other people, using them as means to ensure happiness and in effect it means they have no meaning or rights (Thomson and Wadsworth, 2005) Egoism, sees an individual who performs a completely selfish act as immoral even impossible as it is not in line with true nature of human beings who like all other species have instincts for survival, self preservation and self in trust which is unless pa rt of this natural instinct.This position is neither logical nor flexible champion it would be in support of exploitation of the weak by the strong, which by all other systems is wrong. The system that closely matches my own beliefs is the religious ethical system. This is because the basis for ethics provided is rational since it can be identified wit a perfect God-figure. In addition, the similarity of the principles of these ethics in more or less of the religious are an indicator that they are acceptable to a broad(a) majority hence they cover the needs of most of mankind adequately.In addition, scripture provides answers to ethical problems in all circumstances, something that most other ethical systems do not. The issue of say the birth contradicting only comes up when there is failure to understand the context of scripture. Belief in a God means that we do not have the responsibility of determining what is right, or wrong, since an unquestionable authority has determined t hem already.