Plato, Machiavelli Essay

Machiavelli says the prince only has to seem good, non be good. Plato insists that seeming is bad, being is good. Nicolo Machiavelli is known as being an realist who accredited that item that humans are brutal, selfish, and fickle while Plato was an idealist who believed passel could be ruled by a philosopher king who ruled everywhere the warriors and tradesmen of his ideal republic with rationality. In his view the philosopher-king was in charge of making the state a utopia in that everyone had his/her place and all worked together for the crude good of the state.Machiavelli said that this was a foolish idea. Machiavelli philosophy of government was concern on the ruler. He believed the king, or despot, had the right to do some(prenominal) was essential for his own gain, or whatever the monarch considered the good of the state which he called Virtu. Machiavelli believed the only purpose for a ruler was to make war, and value its citizens from attacks by other states. He adv ocated the slaughter of surrendered generals in order to stupefy hopes of revolution even rationalizing that it was worth the risk of revolution should it anger the people.Machiavelli believed a ruler should be immoral using deception and illusion for federal agency and neer allowing the people to know the real him In Machiavellis time, as it is today, the States whole reason for being was to serve the citizens. The ruler, therefore, is justified in doing whatever is necessary to maintain the country or state, even if it is unjust. In Platos time, man served the state. According to the viewed that ethics and politics are the same, or at least co-terminous. There was no distinction between private feel and public life, as there is today.Plato argues a ruler can never be unjust. Plato argues against this type of ruler, who rules solely by might. Plato tries to prove that it is always break down to be just than unjust , claiming that there is a strong affiliation between justice , personal happiness and the well being of the state. Machiavelli underlines the f make believe that moral principles are not necessarily connected with the efficiency of the act of ruling . If the principles of morality and justice need to be broken in for the state to be prosperous , than this is how things should be done.In the end, Plato and Machiavelli lived very antithetical lives, contributing to their differing thoughts on the world. Plato grew up in the upper aristocratic tell apart but was adopted by Socrates. As he followed Socrates, he conditioned all he would need for his later life as a philosopher when he essentially wandered nigh Greece without pay. In this way he was uninfluenced by richess corruption. Machiavelli, on the other hand, grew up in a wealthy Italian home and lived well supplied for by his patrons. The wealth that he was accustomed to was the main cause for his philosophy centered around personal gain.